Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2658

Mad Props: A 3D-Printed Airplane Engine Will Run This Year

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

The last time engineers designed a civilian turboprop engine from scratch for mass-production, humans had not yet landed on the moon. Unlike jet engines, turboprops typically power small commercial shuttles and personal aircraft, but they still represent a multibillion-dollar market. As a result, a new machine created by a team at GE Aviation is now causing a stir.

That’s because the engine, called the Advanced Turboprop (ATP), will be the first commercial aircraft engine in history with a large portion of components made by additive manufacturing methods, which include 3D printing. The designers reduced 855 separate parts down to just 12. As a result, more than a third of the engine is 3D-printed.

Engineers working on the ATP are planning to run it for the first time in a special test cell in Prague, Czech Republic, later this year. It should see its first test flight in late 2018, and full production is expected to begin in 2020. It will eventually provide the thrust for Cessna’s new Denali, a single-engine, 10-person business aircraft design based on no other aircraft in existence.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Top: GE Aviation’s new Advanced Turboprop (ATP), will be the first commercial aircraft engine in history with a large portion of components made by additive manufacturing methods, which include 3D printing. The designers reduced 855 separate parts down to just 12. As a result, more than a third of the engine is 3D-printed. Above: Engineers are readying 3D printed compressor parts for a balance test. Images credit: GE Aviation.

3D printing, also called additive manufacturing, is helping the GE team bring the ATP from an idea to a working machine in record time. Announced in 2015, “the ATP is going from a dream to a reality in just two years,” says Gordie Follin, the executive manager of GE Aviation’s ATP program. The normal cycle to get to a running engine is usually twice as long, Follin says, and it can take as much as 10 years to develop. “With additive manufacturing, we’re disrupting the whole production cycle,” he says.

Consider this: 35 percent of the engine is being produced with additive methods. A machine with fewer assembled parts also reduces the number of opportunities for wear, which improves durability. The engine is expected to run 1,000 hours longer between overhauls compared to its competitors.

Follin’s group has already produced all of the engine’s parts. They are now assembling everything, adding instrumentation and getting ready to test critical sub-units. The process has been proven to diminish lead, production and assembly time, while also shaving cost and weight in the finished product.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

A 3D printed compressor part for the ATP. Image credit: GE Aviation.

Additive manufacturing also simplifies the supply chain and lowers the opportunities for delays. “These reductions are real,” Follin says. “We’re not putting so much effort into additive manufacturing because it’s a sexy new technology for its own sake. It’s demonstrably better. It lets us disrupt the process.”

GE has been aggressively developing its 3D-printing capabilities in recent years, so far spending $1 billion to mature the technology for its businesses. Last year, the company acquired two manufacturers of 3D-printing machines and launched GE Additive, a new GE business dedicated to supplying 3D printers, materials and engineering consulting services.

Additive manufacturing makes products stronger and more durable. In production aircraft engines, those investments have started paying dividends. CFM International, a joint venture between GE Aviation and Safran Aircraft Engines, is producing the advanced LEAP engine, which is being installed on Airbus’ and Boeing’s new fleet of narrow-body commercial airliners. Complex 3D-printed fuel nozzles on the engine contribute to LEAP’s 15 percent cut in fuel burn and emissions.

Overall, the 3D-printing effort will pay off by decreasing the finished ATP engine’s weight. The engine is 5 percent lighter, which means it will take the aircraft less fuel to attain the same speed. Design changes will allow the ATP to burn 20 percent less fuel and achieve 10 percent more power than its competitors.

“We’re no longer constrained by traditional design and engineering processes,” Follin says. “3D printing is letting us be more creative than we’ve ever been before.”


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2658

Trending Articles